AI Visibility Audit

[object Object]

46
of 100
Grade D · Poor — AI mostly skips you
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
55
Has a Wikipedia article — ChatGPT will identify the business confidently and pull from this entry.
Perplexity
55
100 recent news citations — Perplexity will return current, link-cited info. Strong real-time visibility.
Gemini (Google)
35
No website easily findable. Gemini will struggle to show anything beyond a name match.
Claude.ai
51
Mixed signals. Claude will give a partial answer with appropriate caveats.
Bing Copilot
35
Limited Bing visibility. Copilot may not surface much beyond basic search results.
How scored: deterministic checks across Wikipedia, Google News RSS, DuckDuckGo, and the business's own website (if found). Each engine score is rule-based using documented citation behavior, not LLM inference. Free forever.

Public signals we found

Website
Could not auto-detect
Wikipedia
Object (computer science)
Recent news mentions
100 articles (past year)
DuckDuckGo infobox
✗ Not found

How each engine answers 8 standard customer questions

1. Who is [object Object]?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia identifies this as: "In software development, an object is a semantic entity that has state, behavior, and identity. An object can model some part of reality or can be an ..."
Gap
No gap.
2. What does [object Object] do? What services do they offer?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia describes their services in the article.
Gap
No discoverable website — Gemini struggles.
3. Is [object Object] good? What do customers say about them?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
100 news mentions provide some sentiment signal.
Gap
No gap.
4. How much does [object Object] charge?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
No pricing data accessible.
Gap
No website to scan pricing from.
5. Where is [object Object] located? What are their hours?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Location not in major AI knowledge bases.
Gap
No GBP / DDG infobox — Gemini and Copilot lack location data.
6. How is [object Object] different from competitors?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia article may provide context on positioning.
Gap
Minor gap.
7. Should I trust [object Object]? Are they legitimate?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Multiple trust signals present (Wikipedia / news / website).
Gap
Add diverse trust signals — website + reviews + press + Wikipedia.
8. What public sources cite or mention [object Object]?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia, 100 news articles
Gap
No gap.

What's holding [object Object] back from AI engines

  • Could not auto-detect a website from the business name — Gemini relies heavily on website data + Google Business Profile.
  • No DuckDuckGo Instant Answer card — indicates weak general web indexing across Bing-derived engines.

5 fixes that will move the score

  1. Make sure the business has a discoverable website with the business name in the homepage <title>. Multi-domain attempts (e.g. business.com, business.io) all need to point to one canonical site.
  2. Claim and complete a Google Business Profile + verify the address. Gemini and Bing Copilot both pull from this directly.
  3. Add a clear "About" page on the website with founding story, leadership names, address, and founding year. AI engines weight first-party authority pages heavily.

Need help implementing the fixes?

Our $499 website rebuild includes structured data, GBP optimization, content rewrites for AEO, and citation outreach. Live in 5 days.

Build the fixed site for $499 →

Get notified when [object Object] re-audits

We re-run this audit monthly. Get the diff in your inbox so you can track which fixes moved the score.

Audit another business