AI Visibility Audit

x

76
of 100
Grade B · Good AI visibility
ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
79
Has a Wikipedia article — ChatGPT will identify the business confidently and pull from this entry. Also has web abstract coverage.
Perplexity
79
100 recent news citations — Perplexity will return current, link-cited info. Strong real-time visibility.
Gemini (Google)
77
Website detected with good structured data. Gemini will pull rich info from the site + GBP if claimed.
Claude.ai
75
Wikipedia + clean structured data — Claude will give a confident, well-sourced answer.
Bing Copilot
70
Bing-indexed coverage exists. Copilot will return decent answers with citations.
How scored: deterministic checks across Wikipedia, Google News RSS, DuckDuckGo, and the business's own website (if found). Each engine score is rule-based using documented citation behavior, not LLM inference. Free forever.

Public signals we found

Website detected
x.com
Wikipedia
X
Recent news mentions
100 articles (past year)
DuckDuckGo infobox
✗ Not found

How each engine answers 8 standard customer questions

1. Who is x?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia identifies this as: "X is the twenty-fourth letter of the Latin alphabet, used in the modern English alphabet, the alphabets of other western European languages and others..."
Gap
No gap.
2. What does x do? What services do they offer?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Inferred from website title and content.
Gap
No gap.
3. Is x good? What do customers say about them?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
100 news mentions provide some sentiment signal.
Gap
No gap.
4. How much does x charge?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Pricing data depends on whether website lists prices clearly.
Gap
Depends on website pricing transparency.
5. Where is x located? What are their hours?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Location not in major AI knowledge bases.
Gap
No GBP / DDG infobox — Gemini and Copilot lack location data.
6. How is x different from competitors?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia article may provide context on positioning.
Gap
Minor gap.
7. Should I trust x? Are they legitimate?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Multiple trust signals present (Wikipedia / news / website).
Gap
Add diverse trust signals — website + reviews + press + Wikipedia.
8. What public sources cite or mention x?
Best · ChatGPT (GPT-4o)
Wikipedia, 100 news articles, Own website
Gap
No gap.

What's holding x back from AI engines

  • Website lacks structured data (JSON-LD). All 5 AI engines weight this heavily for confident citation.

5 fixes that will move the score

  1. Add LocalBusiness or Organization JSON-LD schema to the homepage (name, address, telephone, founder, services, hours). Single biggest AEO lever.
  2. Claim and complete a Google Business Profile + verify the address. Gemini and Bing Copilot both pull from this directly.
  3. Add a clear "About" page on the website with founding story, leadership names, address, and founding year. AI engines weight first-party authority pages heavily.

Need help implementing the fixes?

Our $499 website rebuild includes structured data, GBP optimization, content rewrites for AEO, and citation outreach. Live in 5 days.

Build the fixed site for $499 →

Get notified when x re-audits

We re-run this audit monthly. Get the diff in your inbox so you can track which fixes moved the score.

Audit another business